Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • == Ladder escaping too early == ...only has to find a good [[Ladder escape|ladder escape]] from the [[Ladder|ladder]] starting at h1, g2. c2 is such an escape.
    2 KB (379 words) - 03:58, 18 December 2020
  • ...ct, it even gives Blue the opportunity to play b4 and get a free 2nd row [[ladder escape]]. Where should Red play instead? Certainly b4 is a better choice. B * Red d1 connects by [[double threat]] at d3 and b2: <hexboard size="3x6"
    5 KB (895 words) - 02:18, 5 October 2023
  • ...on when no [[ladder escape]] exists, the [[ladder|attacking player]] can [[ladder]] into a corner and create a "quasi-escape piece" at the very last minute. ...ng|breaks the ladder]] by playing one hex ahead. This usually results in a ladder for the opponent. Example:
    4 KB (799 words) - 14:57, 18 November 2023
  • ...an [[edge]]. For example a stone on a second row will escape a second row ladder. Let's see this in action. When Red's ladder reaches the second row stone on the right, Red will be able to connect to t
    2 KB (433 words) - 21:12, 28 December 2020
  • ...dder escape]] while also threatening another connection. It is a kind of [[double threat]]. The only option seems to be a [[ladder]].
    1 KB (228 words) - 01:53, 18 May 2022
  • A [[parallel ladder]] is a situation in which the attacker can make two [[ladder]]s on top of each other. The attacker's ladders are connected to each other ...own here). Red has the option of pushing the 2nd row ladder or the 4th row ladder:
    5 KB (973 words) - 00:36, 29 December 2021
  • Red starts a 3rd row ladder, then immediately breaks and climbs. Red pushes the ladder, breaks, and zippers all the way to the opposite edge.
    14 KB (2,655 words) - 12:53, 27 April 2024
  • ...se connection [[threat]]en to connect via a bridge plus an adjacent step [[double threats|in two different ways]] &mdash; by playing at either of the marked ''(See also the article [[Ladder]])''
    26 KB (4,694 words) - 01:56, 18 May 2022
  • ...blocking the other. An example of a tactic would be to connect a third row ladder by playing the [[switchback#A3_switchback|a3 switchback]]. * [[Ladder handling]]
    3 KB (429 words) - 00:43, 8 May 2023
  • ...nd-4th row [[parallel ladder]]. It can also be used to connect a 2nd row [[ladder]] using a single stone on the 4th row, or to connect a single stone on the Suppose Red has a 2nd-and-4th row [[parallel ladder]] and the amount of space shown here:
    10 KB (1,985 words) - 21:44, 20 April 2024
  • ...means to make a move which prevents an [[outpost]] from being used as a [[ladder escape]], and also [[Intrusion|intrudes]] on the outpost's [[connection]] t ...an play g4, making an unbreakable connection from top to bottom. Thus f6 [[double threat|threatens two different connections]].
    6 KB (1,124 words) - 02:36, 8 January 2023
  • This is a two-piece template and is useful for squeezing edge connections and ladder escapes into relatively small regions. Also, many players are unaware of it ...ed will connect to the edge easily). Now Red's 4 connects to the edge by [[double threat]] at the hexes marked "*". Alternatively, Red can also play 4 before
    31 KB (5,861 words) - 00:58, 9 February 2022
  • ...th via the ladder escape at e5. Also, red threatens to connect north via a double threat at b3 and d3; each of these would connect to the northern edge via [ ...atens to connect c4 to the top and bottom edges with assistance from the [[ladder escape]]s at f2 and f5.
    34 KB (6,464 words) - 23:41, 14 February 2024
  • ...in the bottom part of the board, Blue can play k3. This leads to a 4th row ladder that Red cannot win. For example: ...o the right via [[Edge template IV2a]], and is also connected left via the double threat at the hexes marked *.
    5 KB (1,174 words) - 14:35, 11 May 2023
  • ...king very intently for a viable threat across the top. Klaus's m11 and p12 double threat made it difficult. K6 was a spot I looked at very intently. It's a l ...to deal with it, with my j18, f16 combo reply to create a gauntlet for any ladder chase coming down from my p14 peg. At move 19, György tempted me to blunde
    21 KB (3,875 words) - 14:30, 18 April 2008
  • ...17.L19 N19* J18* i17* N20* K16*, or 17.L18 K18 J17* M19* F18 i13 with the double threat of either M15* or H19. That last line has lots of crucial branches a ...t, so I took a step back and looked at this position as a typical Y-shaped double threat. I looked for a spot high in the branches of the Y, and although the
    23 KB (4,233 words) - 14:30, 18 April 2008
  • Red's main threat is the ladder starting at c7. If Red plays out this ladder, Blue can block it. So Red needs a helping stone somewhere on the right and Therefore, Blue must play 2.e6. Red can now play the ladder at c7, break the ladder at g7, and win:
    4 KB (732 words) - 03:43, 16 June 2021
  • ...de]] for details). The stone at d8 is connected to the left because of the ladder breaker at c2. ...e left. The only possibility to prevent this connection is to play out the ladder:
    3 KB (640 words) - 14:34, 11 May 2023
  • ...ermore be discarded thanks to [[Tom's move]], also known as the [[parallel ladder]] trick. Of course, symmetry will cut our work in half! ...ble moves are at x and y. If Blue plays at x, Red can set up a [[parallel ladder]] and connect using [[Tom's move]].
    8 KB (1,572 words) - 05:15, 10 May 2024
  • ...r consists of the path the ladder will take and the space required for the ladder escape: <hexboard size="7x7" * c4, connecting via [[edge template II]] and a [[double threat]]: <hexboard size="5x5"
    14 KB (2,723 words) - 01:16, 4 October 2023

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)